教育Essay模板:US Charter Schools vs Traditional Public Schools: Is there a benefit?

发布时间:2022-07-08 15:56:08 论文编辑:yuanquan0628

本文是教育专业的留学生Essay范例,题目是“US Charter Schools vs Traditional Public Schools: Is there a benefit?(美国特许学校与传统公立学校:有什么好处吗?)”。截至 2019 年,有 7,000 多所公立特许学校在 43 个州和哥伦比亚特区运营。 这些学校为超过 300 万名学生和 21.9 万名教育工作者提供服务(全国公立特许学校联盟,2019 年)。 特许学校致力于灵活处理每个学生,并为参加者提供最有益的学习体验。

As of 2019, there are over 7,000 public charter schools operating in 43 states and the District of Columbia. These schools serve over three million students with 219 thousand educators (National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, 2019). A charter school works to be flexible around each individual student and provide the most beneficial learning experience to those that attend.

教育Essay模板

Most of the controversial debate around charter schools is based upon whether or not they produce better results than regular public schools. This is generally measured by the students' performance on standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT in high school.

Many studies have been conducted on charter schools to determine overall test scoring, and they all come to different conclusions depending on where the study is done and who it is done by.

CREDO, Standford's, Center for Research on Education Outcomes is the most widely cited source for charter school effects in debates, and their results differ from others. It is important to view results from multiple sources when arguing whether or not charter schools provide a stronger education for students based on standardized test scores.

This report intends to bring multiple sets of data into view in comparison with the studies done by CREDO to provide accurate information and prove that charter schools do not provide significant benefits to a student's education when compared to traditional public schools.

Do charter schools increase test scores overall?特许学校会整体提高考试成绩吗?

Across the United States, studies have been conducted by many organizations using yearly standardized test scores from charter schools and their counterpart public schools. These studies compare the test scores between the two school systems and provide a general conclusion on the effectiveness of charter schools to produce better test results.

在美国各地,许多组织使用特许学校及其对应公立学校的年度标准化考试成绩进行了研究。 这些研究比较了两个学校系统之间的考试成绩,并就特许学校产生更好考试成绩的有效性提供了一般性结论。

RAND Corporation

A study done by the RAND Corporation in 2009 over Chicago, San Diego, Philadelphia, Denver, Milwaukee, and the states of Ohio, Texas, and Florida shows negative or similar results to regular public schools. In Chicago, charter schools fell short to public schools in reading and charters in Texas fell short in both reading and mathematics (Zimmer et al., 2009). However, across all locations, charter schools tended to do better with scoring the longer they were in operation.

St. Louis

A 2014-17 CREDO study on the city of St. Louis shows that students in charter schools made fewer learning gains compared to the statewide public school average.

"The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state" (CREDO 2019).

Firstly, St. Louis Charter Management Organizations (CMO) and Education Management Organizations (EMO) represent non-profit, public charter schools. The data shows that CMOs had a significantly lower growth in ELA, while EMOs and Independent Charters were insignificant in growth. The most notable difference is EMOs and their lack of growth in mathematics. CMOs and Independent Charters were insignificant in growth once again. Overall, in St. Louis, network affiliated charters, CMOs and EMOs, had significantly lower levels of growth in ELA and Math, respectively, than the average gains of the entire state. Independent Charters had an insignificant amount of growth, but it should be noted that it is still less than the state-wide average.

Texas

In Texas, Charter schools had a positive impact after 2-3 years of attendance. Anything before that was no different than public schools. The overall effect was inconsequential, but still slightly greater than that of public schools (Booker et al., 2004). Gronberg and Jansen (2005) also conducted a study in Texas that had the same positive effects for elementary and middle schools, but high school scores were negligible in difference. Lastly, a CREDO (2009) study showed slightly negative effects overall at charter schools in Texas after the first year of enrollment. However, in the third and fourth years of enrollment, charter students had more growth than those in traditional public schools. While it took multiple years of enrollment in the schools of the CREDO study, all three studies showed slightly more growth in Texas charter schools than public schools in the end. This evidence shows that charter schools can be more beneficial than public schools in some situations.

North Carolina

Bifulco and Ladd (2006) concluded that there were slightly negative effects of charters in North Carolina. They estimate that a portion of the negative effect of charter schools is due to high rates of student turnover. CREDO's North Carolina study results, while mixed, showed no overall difference significant enough to prove the education between charters and TPS's were meaningful (CREDO, 2009). In North Carolina, charter schools produced negligible results in growth when compares to their counterpart public schools.

Idaho

A 2006 study in Idaho showed a modest positive effect on education within charter schools (Ballou, et al., 2006).

In the 2005 spring semester, students from all studied grade levels showed a larger gain in overall achievement in charter schools than public schools.

Arizona

A three-year study by Goldwater Institute in Arizona showed a small positive gain in charter schools over the second and third years of enrollment (Solmon, et al., 2001). CREDO (2009) found a similar positive gain in students' third year of enrollment, but negative results in their first and second years.

亚利桑那州戈德沃特研究所的一项为期三年的研究表明,特许学校在入学的第二年和第三年有少量的积极增长(Solmon 等人,2001 年)。 Credo (2009) 发现学生在第三年的入学率也有类似的积极增长,但在第一年和第二年是消极的结果。

Mathematica and Center for Reinventing Public Education

Lastly, Mathematica and CRPE published a report on charter management organizations (Furgeson, et al., 2011). These CMOs were heavily analyzed and only qualified for the study if they were well-established and ran multiple schools. This generally means that the schools included in the study would be better than average charter schools in the area. Unfortunately, the results were quite disappointing and most CMOs showed no impactful change in comparison to traditional public school students. The performances in math, reading, science, and social studies were all very similar; however, some CMOs were outliers that did extremely well, but most were indifferent.

Center for Reinventing Public Education

Also, a large-scale 2011 study by the Center for Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) concluded that middle school reading and high school reading and math had no different effect than regular public schools. There were positive impacts in middle school math and elementary school math and reading, but it was very minimal.

Across all grade levels, evidence showed a minimal increase in reading growth and a modest growth in math. The study concluded that charters out-perform traditional public schools in certain locations, grades, and subjects, but under-perform in others (Betts and Tang, 2011).

教育Essay参考案例

Conclusion结论

In general, charter schools provide no significant growth in the education of students when compared to those at traditional public schools. However, with these studies being based purely off standardized test scores, it fails to take other factors into account with educating students.

一般来说,与传统公立学校相比,特许学校在学生教育方面没有显着增长。 然而,由于这些研究完全基于标准化考试成绩,因此在教育学生时没有考虑其他因素。

The test-based data of charter and public schools varies widely. With some outlying data differences between charter and public schools, there are some that do extremely well in growing a student compared to public school, while others produce worse results. The relative effects are always very modest at best. There are consistent results with charters producing better results the longer they are in operation, as well as student enrollment over multiple years producing greater results than public schools.

Charters still face the same challenges that traditional schools do with meeting every students' specific needs to boost their performance. There are no tests to confidently support either system's form of authority with evidence.

Nevertheless, there are a few studies that have been done on specific organizations and their ways of teaching to produce better results. These charter schools are the exceptions that prove the stigma that charters should be better than traditional public schools. They also provide a strong opening to discuss specific policies and practices to help explain the variation of impacts charters have.

What policies and practices help explain variation in charter school effects?哪些政策和实践有助于解释特许学校效应的差异?

Why do charter schools not get better results than public schools? This question is quite difficult to answer as conditions and policies are not assigned at random, and it is hard to define all the factors that could impact student achievement (Betts and Hill, 2006). The current available evidence is enough to make a few conclusions on what works in schooling.

为什么特许学校没有比公立学校更好的成绩? 这个问题很难回答,因为条件和政策不是随机分配的,而且很难定义可能影响学生成绩的所有因素(Betts 和 Hill,2006 年)。 目前可用的证据足以就学校教育中的有效方法得出一些结论。

One way to see whether a policy "works" in the charter school context is to look at direct tests of said policy. So far, only a few studies have tested and collected data on policies in this manner.

A study on New York City charters found a few policies that worked well and improved overall academic performance in students. Student performance was graded upon standardized test scores and the school's grading system. These policies include a longer school day/year, time devoted to reading, "small rewards/small punishment" discipline, a mission statement focusing on academic achievement, and teacher pay not based on experience and education (Hoxby, et al., 2009). However, many of the schools in this study implemented multiple of these policies at the same time, which does not provide an accurate measure on which one specifically works.

Another New York City study of 35 schools believe that extended time, high-dosage (groups of less than six meeting more than four times a week) tutoring, frequent formal or informal teacher feedback, the use of data to inform instruction, and self-reported focus on achievement can explain 50 percent of the variation in why some schools are more effective than others (Dobbie and Fryer, 2011).

Mathematica's study of charter middle schools did not find many strong or consistent patterns that worked, but some schools earned slightly higher grades when working in groups based on each students' best abilities (Gleason, et al., 2010).

Due to these studies being very limited without testing for each policy being done directly, the results are not extremely consistent with finding what works. Most of these tests only had a small number of schools participating as well. However, the studies do provide some support for extended school time and self-reporting achievement causing an increase in scores.

由于这些研究非常有限,没有直接对每项政策进行测试,因此结果与找到有效的方法并不一致。 大多数这些测试也只有少数学校参与。 然而,这些研究确实为延长上学时间和自我报告成绩提供了一些支持,从而导致分数增加。

Other than testing charter schools by directly implementing new teaching strategies, highperforming charter schools were observed and analyzed to discover why they provide a much greater benefit to students.

Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP) schools are one of the highest profile examples of a successful charter chain. Clark Tuttle et al. (2010) analyzed 22 KIPP middle schools and discovered large gains in math and reading among the students. Due to KIPP schools admitting a specific number of students at each grade level and not replacing them if they leave, attrition could indirectly boost performance.

KIPP schools also get a decent amount of private funding (see Miron, et al., 2011) and provide large amounts of additional school time such as tutoring and after school programs. KIPP schools have 50-60 percent more additional time than other charter schools.

Almost all major chains provide at least 10-20 percent more time to students, with some like KIPP extending it even further. Along with these extra hours, these successful chains tend to push outside of class tutoring on their students. Dobbie and Fryer's 2011 study showed that highdosage tutoring was offered in 27 percent of high achieving charter chains compared to 18 percent in low achieving schools.

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

While some studies implemented multiple policies that increased test scores and grades, said policies were implemented all at once, so it is near impossible to determine which had the greatest effect. The strongest evidence supports extended school hours and tutoring. With both extended time and tutoring being cost-intensive factors, new charters would not be able to afford such luxuries, resulting in a lower performance. Nonetheless, it is undeniable that these factors create the largest improvement in student performance.

Discussion讨论

With the first charter school opening in 1992, more than 25 years of expansion have yet to teach us about what factors influence test-based results. While there are a small group of accomplished outlying charter schools, the majority do not provide any significant benefits that a traditional school district cannot.

随着第一所特许学校于 1992 年开学,超过 25 年的扩张尚未告诉我们哪些因素会影响基于考试的结果。 虽然有一小部分成功的偏远特许学校,但大多数都没有提供传统学区无法提供的任何重大好处。

With most charter schools getting no better or no worse test scores than their traditional counterparts, there is no proven benefit to attending them. The evidence indicates that the very successful chains such as KIPP employ policies that are unattainable for most charters due to the cost and lack of private investments.

However, these results are still limited to testing outcomes; other outcomes such as college attendance/graduation are extremely important. Some of the studies also fail to take variations such as urban areas and areas with lower-performing students into account.

In the end, charter schools produce negligible results when compared to public schools, but they are not going to go away any time soon. More research must be conducted on other outcomes such as graduation rate, college attendance/completion, and parental satisfaction to provide a solid comparison to public schools. It is also important that studies also continue to determine what policies ameliorate performance among all types of schools.

最后,与公立学校相比,特许学校产生的结果微不足道,但它们不会很快消失。 必须对其他结果进行更多研究,例如毕业率、大学出勤率/完成率和父母满意度,以提供与公立学校的可靠比较。 同样重要的是,研究还继续确定哪些政策可以改善所有类型学校的表现。

留学生Essay相关专业范文素材资料,尽在本网,可以随时查阅参考。本站也提供多国留学生课程作业写作指导服务,如有需要可咨询本平台。

提交代写需求

如果您有论文代写需求,可以通过下面的方式联系我们。